Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Public reason and courts (Record no. 11208)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field	02381nam a22002297a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field	BML
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number	9781108487351
082 00 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number	340.11
Item number	LAN
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name	Langvatn, Silje A.
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title	Public reason and courts
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc	New York
Name of publisher, distributor, etc	Cambridge University Press
Date of publication, distribution, etc	2020
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent	367 p.
490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement	Studies on international courts and tribunals
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note	"This book has been made possible with the generous contribution from PluriCourts-Centre for the Study of the Legitimate Roles of the Judiciary in the Global Order, at the University of Oslo, who financed the international workshop Courts and Public Reason in Global Public Law July 2016, and the WZB Berlin Social Science Center who provided the facilities and administrative assistance. Several of the chapters in this volume were presented in early versions at this workshop, while others have been commissioned later."--ECIP Acknowledgements.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc.	"Ever since John Rawls brought the term "public reason" into academic circulation in the mid- 1990s, public reason has been discussed as a criterion of political and legal legitimacy. The idea of public reason is often formulated as the requirement that a polity's political and legal impositions must be publicly justifiable - or possible to justify with reasons and reasoning that is accessible and reasonably acceptable to all subjects of the imposition. Requiring laws to be public justifiable may seen as a means to ensure that all subjects are taken into account, and thus to prevent laws with morally unacceptable outcomes for some groups and individuals. But the criterion of public reason and public justifiability is also associated with the idea that not only the outcomes of laws and public acts counts towards their legitimacy, but also the form and content of their justifications: A law that prohibits a certain religious practice may be perfectly legitimate if it is shown that the practice is a real danger to public health or safety, whereas other types of justifications -such as racist reasons and animus towards a religion- is seen as weakening its legitimacy, or rendering the law illegitimate altogether"--
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element	Political questions and judicial power.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element	Judicial process.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element	Public policy (Law)
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name	Kumm, Mattias,
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name	Sadurski, Wojciech,
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme	Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type	Books

Holdings
Withdrawn status	Lost status	Source of classification or shelving scheme	Damaged status	Not for loan	Collection code	Home library	Current library	Date acquired	Source of acquisition	Cost, normal purchase price	Total Checkouts	Full call number	Barcode	Date last seen	Price effective from	Koha item type	Public note
		Dewey Decimal Classification			Reference	BMU Library	BMU Library	15/01/2025	IBD (Bill No. 121161, Date: 27-12-2024)	11560.00		340.11 LAN	L2511	16/01/2025	16/01/2025	Books	School of Law
		Dewey Decimal Classification			Text Books	BMU Library	BMU Library	15/01/2025	IBD (Bill No. 121161, Date: 27-12-2024)	11560.00		340.11 LAN	L2512	16/01/2025	16/01/2025	Books	School of Law