International investment law and legal theory : expropriation and the fragmentation of sources

By:

Kammerhofer, Jorg

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Cambridge studies in international and comparative lawPublication details: New York Cambridge University Press 2021Description: 357 pISBN:

9781108984539

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

346.092 KAM

Summary: "If there is still doubt that the fragmentation of international law is very real, one need only take a look at the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2007 and 2010 judgments in Ahmadou Sallo Diallo.1 In that case, the Court pointedly ignored the very closely interwoven customary international law on the protection of foreigners and their property abroad and the treaty-based investment law and arbitral case-law. In its 2007 judgment on preliminary objections, it 'note[d] that, in contemporary international law, the protection of the rights of companies . . . [is] essentially governed by bilateral or multilateral agreements for the protection of foreign investments'"--

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Books	BMU Library	Reference	346.092 KAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Available	SOL		L2513
Books	BMU Library	Text Books	346.092 KAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Available	SOL		L2514

Browsing BMU Library shelves, Collection: Reference Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	346.071 CHA Supreme court on company law Vol-3 : Compendium of cases 1950-2021	346.0721 HIL Compulsory licensing :	346.078 SOO Emergence of commercial justice : insolvency and arbitration	346.092 KAM International investment law and legal theory : expropriation and the fragmentation of sources	346.092 KUM Guide to capital market & securities law	346.092 PIN Handbook on securities laws	346.41 VAT Law & Practice of Insolvency & Bankruptcy VOL-1	Next

"If there is still doubt that the fragmentation of international law is very real, one need only take a look at the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2007 and 2010 judgments in Ahmadou Sallo Diallo.1 In that case, the Court pointedly ignored the very closely interwoven customary international law on the protection of foreigners and their property abroad and the treaty-based investment law and arbitral case-law. In its 2007 judgment on preliminary objections, it 'note[d] that, in contemporary international law, the protection of the rights of companies . . . [is] essentially governed by bilateral or multilateral agreements for the protection of foreign investments'"--

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.